Software companies

Make cryptographic inventory part of software delivery

Qubrisk helps product-security and platform teams understand cryptography across a portfolio without turning adoption into an all-at-once blocking gate.

Decision brief

Primary query
enterprise cryptographic inventory
Best for
Teams that need reviewable cryptographic evidence, ownership, and continuous migration control.
Safety boundary
Evidence supports decisions; it is not proof of implementation safety or compliance.

Software vendors need to answer customer and internal questions about cryptographic dependencies while continuing to ship. The estate spans application code, frameworks, transitive packages, containers, infrastructure configuration, TLS, authentication, signing, and third-party services. One central scan is insufficient because every dependency update and feature can change the inventory.

Qubrisk brings discovery into repositories and CI. Teams can baseline existing debt, generate open artifacts, assign owners through repository context, and block or review only newly introduced policy violations. Product security retains portfolio visibility while application teams receive exact evidence and can return verification through their normal issue and pull-request workflows.

Capabilities

What the operating model needs to do

01

Portfolio discovery

Normalize assets across languages, repositories, dependencies, configuration, and release artifacts.

02

Developer-native evidence

Deliver precise locations and SARIF without requiring engineers to learn a separate audit workflow.

03

Baseline adoption

Record existing debt while enforcing stricter rules on new and changed code.

04

Customer-ready exports

Produce scoped CBOM and evidence packages with explicit limitations.

Workflow

A repeatable path to evidence

Use explicit scope, accountable decisions, and verification gates. Keep unknowns visible so progress is not manufactured by narrowing the denominator.

  1. 1

    Onboard repositories

    Connect ownership, define scan scope, and establish rules for local evidence handling.

  2. 2

    Create the baseline

    Review current findings, classify unknowns, and assign the most consequential work.

  3. 3

    Integrate CI

    Generate CBOM and SARIF on change and apply repository-appropriate policy.

  4. 4

    Operate the program

    Track migration, exceptions, verification, and portfolio coverage over time.

Expected deliverables

Artifacts the next team can inspect

  • Repository-level crypto inventory
  • CBOM and SARIF build artifacts
  • Owner and migration backlog
  • Pull-request drift checks
  • Scoped customer evidence package

Buyer checklist

Questions for a proof of value

  1. 01Which languages and artifact types are covered?
  2. 02Can source remain inside CI?
  3. 03Can each team adopt without immediately failing all builds?
  4. 04Are transitive dependencies represented?
  5. 05Can customer exports state scope and limitations clearly?

Limits and cautions

What this page does not promise

  • Customer evidence should not be marketed as proof of cryptographic safety.
  • Repository ownership may not equal runtime service ownership.
  • Runtime and vendor-managed cryptography need complementary discovery.
Local-first discovery

Start with evidence from one representative repository

Run a scoped scan, inspect every result, export the CBOM, and decide whether the evidence is strong enough to support your operating model.

Create a workspace